He wasn't charged with having a consensual blowjob: his "crime" was perjury, making the lawyerly evasion "I didn't have sex with that woman": meaning "I didn't have sexual intercourse" (fucking) with that woman.
I suppose he did us the service of providing a precedent for tRump's lies and attempts at a cover up, and then trying to cover up the financial crime in the coverup.
Paybacks are hell.
And Luttig is right: there is a best sequence to start the tRump prosecutions to assure they work.
Small caveat re: Clinton impeachment:
He wasn't charged with having a consensual blowjob: his "crime" was perjury, making the lawyerly evasion "I didn't have sex with that woman": meaning "I didn't have sexual intercourse" (fucking) with that woman.
I suppose he did us the service of providing a precedent for tRump's lies and attempts at a cover up, and then trying to cover up the financial crime in the coverup.
Paybacks are hell.
And Luttig is right: there is a best sequence to start the tRump prosecutions to assure they work.
Yes, but perjury committed to cover up an affair is similar to what Trump did, no? Hush money to cover up an affair, right?